Statistics revised

[Alex Brown]

Dear all,

Of the SC 34 working groups, I suppose WG 6 would be most apt for comparison ...

- Alex.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: MURATA Makoto (FAMILY Given) [mailto:eb2m-mrt at asahi-net.or.jp]
> Sent: 23 June 2010 01:33
> To: e-SC34-WG4 at ecma-international.org
> Subject: Re: Statistics revised
> 
> > Out of curiosity, how does this compare to other SC34 working groups?
> 
> Other standards from SC34 do not have DR statistics.  Most standards receive
> no DRs or very few.  I guess the reasons are:
> 
> A) Nobody cares
> B) The standard is almost perfect.
> 
> In the case of 19757-2:2006, the reason is B.  I have not seen DRs for SDIF and
> the reason is A.
> 
> In our case, a lot of people still care and the standard is not perfect.
> 
> 
> Cheers,
> Makoto
> 
> __________________________________________________________
> ____________
> This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System.
> For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email
> __________________________________________________________
> ____________

______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System.
For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email 
______________________________________________________________________