To pursue "+opczip" or not to do so?

[MURATA Makoto (FAMILY Given)]

> It appears that several packaging formats are available.  (See
> http://broadcast.oreilly.com/2009/01/packaging-formats-of-famous-ap.html)
> We cannot say that OPC is the only.  I can imagine that the battle for
> "+opczip" is not going to be an easy one.

In the case of the "+xml" convention, I have 180 e-mails containing 
"+xml" in my mail folder before RFC 3023 (XML media types) was 
published.  The discussion took about 6 months.

FYI:  The e-mail archive of the ietf-xml-mime ML is available at:

http://www.imc.org/ietf-xml-mime/mail-archive/

Cheers,
Makoto