DR 09-0222 - WML: Bibliography Structured Document Tags

[Alex Brown]

> a parent element in the XML hierarchy

In that case, should not the spec refer to an "ancestor" (or "nearest ancestor") element?

- Alex.


From: Shawn Villaron [mailto:shawnv at microsoft.com]
Sent: 18 March 2010 13:41
To: 'SC 34 WG4'
Subject: DR 09-0222 - WML: Bibliography Structured Document Tags

This is in regards to the GB defect report.  Our proposed response is as follows.
DR 09-0222 - WML: Bibliography Structured Document Tags
No change is needed.

The phrase "parent structured document tag" is sufficient enough to imply that the bibliography element has a parent element in the XML hierarchy that is of type structured document tag. This statement does not state that the parent element of a bibliography element is a structured document tag. In other words, a bibliography element must have an sdtPr element as a parent, which in turn must have an sdt element as a parent. This information is clear in the standard and schema.


______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System.
For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email
______________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System.
For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email 
______________________________________________________________________
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.vse.cz/pipermail/sc34wg4/attachments/20100318/a4d99a89/attachment.htm>