DR 09-0300 - WML, Headers and Footers: Behavior contradictory for missing header/footer type
Shawn Villaron
shawnv at microsoft.com
Tue Mar 23 15:15:46 CET 2010
Minor updates. I believe we can move this to LAST CALL with these changes.
From: Shawn Villaron [mailto:shawnv at microsoft.com]
Sent: Thursday, March 18, 2010 11:51 PM
To: 'SC 34 WG4'
Subject: DR 09-0300 - WML, Headers and Footers: Behavior contradictory for missing header/footer type
This is in regards to the Ecma defect report. Adoption of the recommended solution is suggested:
Part 1, §17.10.1
If this element is set to false and an even page header/footer is specified, then it shall be ignored and only the odd page header/footer shall be displayed. Conversely, if this element is set to true and either header/footer type is omitted for a given section, the appropriate header/footer should be inherited from the previous section; if this is the first section in the document, then a blank header/footer shall be created as needed (another header/footer type shall not be used in its place).
Part 1, §17.10.6
If this element is set to false and a first page header/footer is specified, then it shall be ignored and only the odd page header/footer shall be displayed. Conversely, if this element is set to true and the first page header/footer type is omitted for the given section, the first page header/footer should be inherited from the previous section; if this is the first section in the document, then a blank header/footer shall be created as needed (another header/footer type shall not be used in its place).
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.vse.cz/pipermail/sc34wg4/attachments/20100323/13ead2d3/attachment.htm>
More information about the sc34wg4
mailing list