DR 09-0168 ? OPC: No mechanism to distinguish ECMA-376:2006 from IS 29500

[Chris Rae]

Rex points out that my new clause appears to be entirely missing from my DR. This seems true, looking at my local version. Murata-san, did you get a complete copy from which you made those edits?

The writing took me quite a while so if anyone else has a copy I'd very much appreciate it back again. :)

Chris

-----Original Message-----
From: Chris Rae 
Sent: 23 November 2010 11:00
To: 'MURATA Makoto (FAMILY Given)'; e-SC34-WG4 at ecma-international.org
Subject: RE: DR 09-0168 ? OPC: No mechanism to distinguish ECMA-376:2006 from IS 29500

This looks fine to me - I think it makes a bit more sense in Clause 8 than 2.1, though.

Chris

-----Original Message-----
From: MURATA Makoto (FAMILY Given) [mailto:eb2m-mrt at asahi-net.or.jp] 
Sent: 18 November 2010 14:46
To: e-SC34-WG4 at ecma-international.org
Subject: Re: DR 09-0168 ? OPC: No mechanism to distinguish ECMA-376:2006 from IS 29500

Chris,

Thanks for your clarifications.

I then propose to rewrite your new clause "Packaging" in Part 4.

	Clause 8 (in Part 4)

	No OPC part names in documents of conformance class Transitional
	shall contain characters that match the non-terminal ucschar in
	RFC 3987.

	Note: This additional condition ensures interoperability between 
	Ecma 376 (1st edition) and the conformance class Transitional.

Alternatively, we might want to incorporate this restriction in Clause
2.1 (Document Conformance) of Part 4.

Cheers,
Makoto