RE: DR 09-0286 — OPC: The syntax of "references"

[Chris Rae]

Hi Murata-san - as the standard states right now, these can be "any URI and nothing else". I am guessing from your response that you're not going to be wild with excitement about that one.

I think this specific DR can be resolved as it was created to request clarifying the syntax of references, and the current solution from Shawn seems to do that. You may want to submit a separate DR requesting the broadening of these syntaxes - I'd be very interested to look at other possible solutions although I'd be keen for the existing URI schemes still to work, just in order to allow current IS 29500 documents to also be compatible with future IS 29500s.

You're right, I was talking nonsense about the "pack:" requirement, they don't have to include the scheme specifier. Apologies.

Chris

-----Original Message-----
From: eb2mmrt at gmail.com [mailto:eb2mmrt at gmail.com] On Behalf Of MURATA Makoto
Sent: 26 August 2010 14:49
To: Chris Rae
Cc: e-SC34-WG4 at ecma-international.org
Subject: Re: DR 09-0286 — OPC: The syntax of "references"

Chris,

I do not think your answer is clear yet.

I would like to hear answers such as

 "any IRI and nothing else"
 "any LEIRI  and nothing else"
 "any IRI having the pack scheme and nothing else"
 "any LEIRI having the pack scheme and nothing else"

I do not want to percent-encode non-ascii when I reference to another OPC part.  So, I did not list "any URI and nothing else"

And are you sure that what you call references is required to begin with "pack"?

Cheers,
Makoto