PLEASE PROOF: My first draft of the new DCOR for 29500-1/Amd.1

[Arms, Caroline]

I had noticed this as well and was going to bring it up on the call.  Item 261 modifies 21.2.2.136, which itself refers to 21.2.3.34 (the clause that caused the conflict).

As amended by 261, 21.2.2.136 has the right upper limit (240, not 100) but describes it as a percentage.  For values it refers to 21.2.3.34 (which COR1 changes to describe as integers that correspond to half degrees (not percentages).

I think keeping 261 would be better than deleting it.  If rewording 261 is OK for this COR to an AMD, I'd be for that.  We can adapt the text from COR1 item 457.

    Caroline


Caroline Arms
Library of Congress Contractor
Co-compiler of Sustainability of Digital Formats resource
http://www.digitalpreservation.gov/formats/

** Views expressed are personal and not necessarily those of the institution **
________________________________________
From: MURATA Makoto (FAMILY Given) [eb2m-mrt at asahi-net.or.jp]
Sent: Thursday, September 30, 2010 9:27 AM
To: SC 34 WG4
Subject: Re: PLEASE PROOF: My first draft of the new DCOR for 29500-1/Amd.1

Should we reformulate  #261 in the Part1 AMD1 as well?

Cheers,
Makoto