Character repertoire checking for SML cells

[Chris Rae]

In that case it seems like an ignorable optional attribute would be a good way to go, from my point of view at least.

Chris

-----Original Message-----
From: eb2mmrt at gmail.com [mailto:eb2mmrt at gmail.com] On Behalf Of MURATA Makoto
Sent: 05 April 2011 10:41
To: Chris Rae
Cc: SC34
Subject: Re: Character repertoire checking for SML cells

It is sometimes (but not always) applied to a range of cells.  So, I am trying to mimick @s of c elements.

Regards,
Makoto

2011/4/6 Chris Rae <Chris.Rae at microsoft.com>:
> Hi Murata-san - quick question - in your opinion, would this normally be applied to a range of cells (a whole sheet, or perhaps an area of a sheet) or just one single cell? If it's the former then I think it might be worth doing it in a similar way to cell formatting - if it's the latter then certainly an attribute on the cell is probably the right way to go.
>
> Chris
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: eb2mmrt at gmail.com [mailto:eb2mmrt at gmail.com] On Behalf Of MURATA 
> Makoto
> Sent: 05 April 2011 08:10
> To: SC34
> Subject: Re: Character repertoire checking for SML cells
>
> It is an optional attribute.  It is present only when character repertoire checking is needed.  I suppose that it is usually absent.
>
> c elements already have other attributes.  Do these attribute cause troubles?
>
>  attribute r { sml_ST_CellRef },
>
>  ## default value: 0
>  attribute i { xsd:int }?,
>
>  ## default value: false
>  attribute s { xsd:boolean }?,
>
>  ## default value: false
>  attribute l { xsd:boolean }?,
>
>  ## default value: false
>  attribute t { xsd:boolean }?,
>
>  ## default value: false
>  attribute a { xsd:boolean }?
>
>
> Regards,
> Makoto
>
> 2011/4/5 Shawn Villaron <shawnv at microsoft.com>:
>> By putting it on the c element, wouldn't that add considerably to the size of the file ( as well as parsing time, etc. )?
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: MURATA Makoto (FAMILY Given) [mailto:eb2m-mrt at asahi-net.or.jp]
>> Sent: Monday, April 04, 2011 1:10 AM
>> To: SC34
>> Subject: Character repertoire checking for SML cells
>>
>> I am wondering how we should attach CREPDL schemas to SML cells.
>>
>> Option A)
>>
>> 1) Introduce an attribute (say @c) to elements <c> in SML.
>>    This attribute is an ignorable attribute.
>> 2) Introduce a new OPC part.  The direct child elements of the
>>    root element are CREPL schemas, as specified in 19757-7.
>> 3) The @c attrribute specify which of the direct child elements
>>    is used for the cell in question.
>>
>> Option B)
>>
>> 1 and 3) are the same as in A).
>> 2) Introduce a new OPC part.  Each direct child element of the root
>>    element references a CREPDL schema, which is another OPC part.
>>
>> Which do you think is better?  Do we have to introduce relationship element (in sheetx.xml.rels) for each sheetx.xml?
>>
>> Regards,
>> Makoto
>>
>>
>
>
>
> --
>
> Praying for the victims of the Japan Tohoku earthquake
>
> Makoto
>
>



-- 

Praying for the victims of the Japan Tohoku earthquake

Makoto