Revised document conformance text

[MURATA Makoto (FAMILY Given)]

I have no problems in keeping the subclasses, but what 
is the difference between application profiles and conformance 
classes?

Cheers,
Makoto

> Hi all,
> 
> I think we should keep the subclasses. What you are talking about sounds
> more like an application profile than a conformance class/requirement to
> me.
> 
> 
> 
> Med venlig hilsen / Best regards
> 
> Jesper Lund Stocholm
> 
> CIBER Danmark A/S
> Mobil: +45 3094 5570
> Email: jesper.stocholm at ciber.dk
> 
> 
> 
> CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE AND NOTICE REGARDING NO ELECTRONIC SIGNATURE: The
> materials in this electronic transmission (including attachments) may be
> subject to attorney-client or work product privilege, may be private and
> confidential and are the property of the sender. The information
> contained is intended only for the named addressee(s) and should not be
> considered evidence of intent to be bound to any agreement. The taking
> of any action in reliance on the contents is strictly prohibited. If you
> are not the intended recipient of this message, please immediately
> notify the sender and promptly delete this message.
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: MURATA Makoto (FAMILY Given) [mailto:eb2m-mrt at asahi-net.or.jp]
> > Sent: Tuesday, August 02, 2011 12:52 PM
> > To: e-SC34-WG4 at ecma-international.org
> > Subject: Re: Revised document conformance text
> > 
> > Chris,
> > 
> > I think that the three subclasses were introduced since some
> application
> > programs can handle only one of WML, PML, and SML.
> > 
> > One could argue that we should either go further (such as "WML
> > strict-horizontal-writing-only-black-and-white-only") or stop at
> "Strict".
> > How do people feel?
> > 
> > If we really drop the subclasses, we have to be thorough.  Part 4 has
> 14
> > occurrences of "ML Transitional" and 3 occurrences of "ML strict",
> while
> > Part 1 has 17 occurrences of "ML strict" and 6 occurrences of "ML
> > transitional"
> > 
> > 
> > Cheers,
> > Makoto