MCE questions

[Jesper Lund Stocholm]

Hello all,

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Chris Rae [mailto:Chris.Rae at microsoft.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, August 02, 2011 11:23 PM
> To: MURATA Makoto (FAMILY Given); SC34
> Subject: RE: MCE questions
> 
> Hi Murata-san - as we discussed on the call, my thoughts on this echo
> Florian's. I think the answer to each of your questions from my point
of
> view is yes (and yes to all the sub-questions) - I am in favour of
> performing short-circuit style evaluation here and just ignoring the
> entire content of the element, regardless of whether it contains
further
> MCE instructions (valid or invalid).
> 
> I'd be interested to hear what others in WG4 felt.

I'm thinking that "less is more" here. The more simple we make our model
the more easy it will be to understand and thus more likely to be used
(correctly).

It's rather difficult to get your head around "nested MCE instructions"
here, so I am in favor of your approach, Chris.


Med venlig hilsen / Best regards

Jesper Lund Stocholm

CIBER Danmark A/S
Mobil: +45 3094 5570
Email: jesper.stocholm at ciber.dk



CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE AND NOTICE REGARDING NO ELECTRONIC SIGNATURE: The
materials in this electronic transmission (including attachments) may be
subject to attorney-client or work product privilege, may be private and
confidential and are the property of the sender. The information
contained is intended only for the named addressee(s) and should not be
considered evidence of intent to be bound to any agreement. The taking
of any action in reliance on the contents is strictly prohibited. If you
are not the intended recipient of this message, please immediately
notify the sender and promptly delete this message.