Re: DR 10-0052 — WML: clarification for the example in w:rtl
Amit Aronovitch
aronovitch at gmail.com
Mon Jan 24 01:26:00 CET 2011
It seems that the Arabic words were reversed (and also had a minor font-size
inconsistency).
I am attaching a (hopefully) fixed version.
The XML fix seems OK.
The grammatical change also agrees with what I said, but note that since my
knowledge in Arabic is very limited, I did not originally include that
comment in the DR (it had been sent by email as a comment to the editor).
thanks,
Amit A.
On Fri, Jan 21, 2011 at 11:50 PM, Chris Rae <Chris.Rae at microsoft.com> wrote:
>
> http://cid-c8ba0861dc5e4adc.office.live.com/view.aspx/Public%20Documents/2010/DR-10-0052.docx
>
> This DR covers a minor oversight in the XML (which was easy for me to fix)
> and a minor grammatical edit in the Arabic (which wasn't). I've written up
> proposed changes, and here they are. I'm including Amit, the submitter of
> the DR, so he can review.
>
> Chris
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.vse.cz/pipermail/sc34wg4/attachments/20110124/c9878cd3/attachment-0001.htm>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: DR 10-0052 proposed changes.docx
Type: application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document
Size: 55519 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mailman.vse.cz/pipermail/sc34wg4/attachments/20110124/c9878cd3/attachment-0001.bin>
More information about the sc34wg4
mailing list