RE: DR 10-0049 ― OPC: Bits reserved by PKWARE

[Chris Rae]

That's certainly better wording, but unfortunately "currently unused" appears in a number of other paragraphs in that same section. I was hoping to avoid giving readers the sense that "currently unused" was somehow different to "unused". :(

Chris

-----Original Message-----
From: MURATA Makoto [mailto:eb2m-mrt at asahi-net.or.jp] 
Sent: 26 January 2011 22:28
To: Chris Rae
Cc: e-SC34-WG4 at ecma-international.org
Subject: Re: DR 10-0049 ― OPC: Bits reserved by PKWARE

Chris,

I also think that we should first address this small issue and then address larger issues when we create a revision of Part 2.  I would like to replace "Currently unused" by "Unused'.

Cheers,
Makoto

sent from my iPhone

On 2011/01/27, at 10:37, Chris Rae <Chris.Rae at microsoft.com> wrote:

> http://cid-c8ba0861dc5e4adc.office.live.com/view.aspx/Public%20Documen
> ts/2010/DR-10-0049.docx
> 
> This DR covers “bits reserved by PKWARE” in Part 2. We talked about it in Beijing – it spurred a discussion regarding whether quite a few of the tables in Part 2 could be rewritten.
> 
> Whilst I think there’s some potential for that, it wasn’t the original intent of this DR – I think this actual DR can be resolved by simply changing these bits to “unused”, as I suspect they’re unused by any implementations right now. Changes are attached.
> 
> Chris
> <DR 10-0049 proposed changes.docx>