DR 09-0320 ? OPC: Relationships Markup

[MURATA Makoto]

It appears that we did not close this DR.    Chris agreed
on my proposal shown below:

>So, I think that we should close this DR using the original (defective)
>wording in the current DR and submit another DR for our failure to
>taking MCE into consideration.

Regards,
Makoto



2010/8/18 Chris Rae <Chris.Rae at microsoft.com>:
> Hi all - this seems like a good option, as the application of MCE covers other areas as well as just this one.
>
> Chris
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: MURATA Makoto (FAMILY Given) [mailto:eb2m-mrt at asahi-net.or.jp]
> Sent: 17 August 2010 06:01
> To: e-SC34-WG4 at ecma-international.org
> Subject: Re: DR 09-0320 ? OPC: Relationships Markup
>
> Chris,
>
>>  Could we say "after the application of the principles described by
>>ISO/IEC 29500-3" instead, and avoid the use of "process"?
>
> I read the conformance clause of Part 3.  It defines document conformance but it simply means correct use of MCE elems and atts.
> Nothing to do with document validation against the original schema.
>
> Although I am certainly a fan of finishing DRs step by step, I do not introduce another poor wording about MCE.
>
> So, I think that we should close this DR using the original (defective) wording in the current DR and submit another DR for our failure to taking MCE into consideration.
>
> http://cid-c8ba0861dc5e4adc.office.live.com/view.aspx/Public%20Documents/2009/DR-09-0320.docx
>
> Cheers,
> Makoto
>
>



-- 

Praying for the victims of the Japan Tohoku earthquake

Makoto