RE: DR 09-0281 ? OPC: Use of the term “part”

[Chris Rae]

This looks like a much better definition - the use of "pack URI" in our definition was inadvertent. So I also think we can close this in Berlin. I shall stop short of calling it an "easy DR" as history has not treated kindly my pronouncements of that sort.

Chris

-----Original Message-----
From: eb2mmrt at gmail.com [mailto:eb2mmrt at gmail.com] On Behalf Of MURATA Makoto
Sent: 16 June 2011 06:59
To: e-SC34-WG4 at ecma-international.org
Subject: Re: DR 09-0281 ? OPC: Use of the term “part”

I have another proposal as the definition of "part name".

	part name
	A hierarchical path string used as an identifier of an OPC part.
        Further syntactical constraints are described in 9.1.1.1.

I think that this definition should not rely on pack URIs, since parck URIs are defined based on part names (tautology).

I agree with Chris and Shaw for the rest of the change proposal.  I hope to close this DR in Berlin.

Regards,
Makoto