Revised document conformance text

[Alex Brown]

Dear all,

No - we were, in the end, just addressing the Document Conformance (and so the app conformance stuff should have been deleted - but not change tracked - in the suggested change). I think we were all flagging a bit when these DRs were done. Perhaps, since they are 'high impact' we could re-confirm them in a conference call ...

- Alex.

-----Original Message-----
From: Doug Mahugh [mailto:Doug.Mahugh at microsoft.com] 
Sent: 27 June 2011 02:20
To: Chris Rae; e-SC34-WG4 at ecma-international.org
Subject: RE: Revised document conformance text

Perhaps there was some sloppiness here related to the last-minute rush to get this done? Or is there really an intent to remove the concept of application conformance altogether? I don't recall us ever discussing such a change.

- Doug

-----Original Message-----
From: Chris Rae [mailto:Chris.Rae at microsoft.com]
Sent: Tuesday, June 21, 2011 8:01 AM
To: e-SC34-WG4 at ecma-international.org
Subject: Revised document conformance text

Alex and I think we're happy with the attached text for document conformance clauses on parts 1 and 4. We'll project these tomorrow, at which point we can hopefully close the three related DRs.

The texts have actual change-tracking applied, rather than the formatting I normally use to indicate change-tracked text.

Chris

______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System.
For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email ______________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System.
For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email 
______________________________________________________________________