Flat Packaging Format (Possible OOXML extension 30114-3).

[MURATA Makoto]

Alex,

I will publish this document as a WG4 numbered document.

Regards,
Makoto

2012/7/2 Alex Brown <alexb at griffinbrown.co.uk>:
> Dear all,
>
>
>
> At the just-finished Brazil meeting I gave a brief presentation outlining a
> proposal for an alternative “flat” representation of OPC packages. Please
> find attached a draft for such a spec.
>
>
>
> I have included some editorial notes which contain some important queries. I
> have attempted to reverse-engineer the format from what MS-Office does so as
> to give this standard a chance to integrate with the existing OOXML
> ecosystem, and to base it on something which has been implemented. However,
> some guesswork was of course necessary, so feedback would be valuable.
>
>
>
> A couple of points of particular interest:
>
>
>
> 1. The namespace in existing implementations contains “microsoft”, and I
> have left this as-is. Apart from the PR dimension I don’t see this as
> significant as Namespace Names are merely arbitrary strings, and I think it
> is more important we plug in to existing files which may be out there then
> start with an incompatible freshly-minted Name (for which I can see no
> benefit).
>
>
>
> 2. Unfortunately, Microsoft has elected to name one of its elements
> “xmlData”, which violates the spirit – and maybe the letter – of the XML
> Recommendation. I have however left this as-is as most tools in practice do
> not register this phenomenon. Thoughts?
>
>
>
> - Alex.
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ______________________________________________________________________
> This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
> For more information please visit http://www.symanteccloud.com
> ______________________________________________________________________



-- 

Praying for the victims of the Japan Tohoku earthquake

Makoto