RE: DR 12-0014 - SML: Table, term not defined
Rex Jaeschke
rex at RexJaeschke.com
Thu Jan 24 16:04:19 CET 2013
I agree. I've tweaked Chris's proposal using Caroline's suggestion.
Rex
-----Original Message-----
From: Chris Rae [mailto:Chris.Rae at microsoft.com]
Sent: Wednesday, January 23, 2013 4:17 PM
To: Arms, Caroline; e-SC34-WG4 at ecma-international.org
Subject: RE: DR 12-0014 - SML: Table, term not defined
I think this looks much better actually - thank you indeed.
Chris
-----Original Message-----
From: Arms, Caroline [mailto:caar at loc.gov]
Sent: 23 January 2013 13:04
To: Chris Rae; e-SC34-WG4 at ecma-international.org
Subject: RE: DR 12-0014 - SML: Table, term not defined
Chris,
When I read the new text for insertRow (Insert Row Showing)
"An insert row indicates to a consuming application that a table is
present which has no data in it, allowing the application to indicate to the
user how to extend the table." I expected the "table" to be completely
empty. And then was confused on reading the text for insertRowShift.
Perhaps
"An insert row indicates to a consuming application that a table has a new
row which has no data in it, allowing the application to indicate to the
user how to enter data and extend the table."
might avoid the confusion.
Caroline
Caroline Arms
Library of Congress Contractor
Co-compiler of Sustainability of Digital Formats resource
http://www.digitalpreservation.gov/formats/
** Views expressed are personal and not necessarily those of the institution
** ________________________________________
From: Chris Rae [Chris.Rae at microsoft.com]
Sent: Monday, January 21, 2013 8:02 PM
To: e-SC34-WG4 at ecma-international.org
Subject: DR 12-0014 - SML: Table, term not defined
https://skydrive.live.com/view.aspx/Public%20Documents/2012/DR-12-0014.docx?
cid=c8ba0861dc5e4adc&sc=documents
Another proposed solution. Although there are 12 occurrences of "insert row"
throughout the standard, only these two refer to this particular concept.
Chris
More information about the sc34wg4
mailing list