DR 13:0013: Proposed solution to "the blue ones"

[Arms, Caroline]

Extra clarification sounds a good idea to me.   Caroline

-----Original Message-----
From: Francis Cave [mailto:francis at franciscave.com] 
Sent: Tuesday, August 19, 2014 4:34 PM
To: Arms, Caroline; 'Chris Rae'; e-SC34-WG4 at ecma-international.org
Subject: RE: DR 13:0013: Proposed solution to "the blue ones"

Caroline, Chris

I don't like "previous level", since I'm not completely sure how to interpret this in terms of the style hierarchy as defined in 17.7.2. I think that it probably means "previous step in the style hierarchy application process" (see third para of 17.7.1, where it talks about "following each level in the tree"), but I'm not completely sure about that. I note that "previous level in the style hierarchy" is used in several places in the current text (see, for example, 17.7.1), which is an argument for using Caroline's suggested re-wording. May I suggest that it should be made clear somewhere, possibly in 17.7.2, what is meant by the "previous level"?

Francis




-----Original Message-----
From: Arms, Caroline [mailto:caar at loc.gov]
Sent: 19 August 2014 19:49
To: 'Chris Rae'; e-SC34-WG4 at ecma-international.org
Subject: RE: DR 13:0013: Proposed solution to "the blue ones"

Chris,

One small suggestion (occurs twice)

17.3.2.40	u (Underline)

color (Underline Color)

"by the setting previously set at any level of the style hierarchy"

I might change to "by the setting from any previous level of the style hierarchy"
===

ditto for val (Underline Style)

Just my 2 cents.

  Caroline

-----Original Message-----
From: Chris Rae [mailto:Chris.Rae at microsoft.com]
Sent: Monday, August 18, 2014 2:26 PM
To: e-SC34-WG4 at ecma-international.org
Subject: DR 13:0013: Proposed solution to "the blue ones"

Attached are my proposed changes for the "blue" DR 13-0013 (https://onedrive.live.com/view.aspx/Public Documents/2013/DR-13-0013.docx) changes. These are ones for which prose needed to be added to the standard to cover behavior (i.e. this could not be represented in schema).

I've attached my changes - as part of the work I scanned Office's implementer notes and found one more example of the themeShade/themeTint behavior that many of these items represent. I've made a comment on that particular change.

Also attached is a test document I used to verify the behavior of the optional column width settings.

At this point, the only bucket I have left is the green ones. Although they're the ones marked as "need individual investigation" and there are 24 of them, so I might not make amazingly fast progress. I'm still anticipating being done by Kyoto, as promised.

Chris