Finals Drafts of the DCOR Set for 29500 Parts 1 and 4

[MURATA Makoto]

Redlining appears to be missing in #36, through 42.

The table in #80 delete rows and add rows.  But
it should change existing rows.

Regards,
Makoto

2014-12-12 4:58 GMT+09:00 MURATA Makoto <eb2m-mrt at asahi-net.or.jp>:

> No redlining for the first change (1. §1, “Scope”, p. 1).  Is this good?
>
> MDX and OLAP are moved from Terms and Definitions to §12.1, “Glossary of
> SpreadsheetML-Specific Terms.  But ODBC appears in both
> places.
>
> ISO/IEC 29500-3:20xx should be ISO/IEC 29500-3:2015?
>
> Is the sentence "The zip item name is incorrect." in the 9th entry
> required?
>
> Regards,
> Makoto
>
> 2014-12-12 2:25 GMT+09:00 Rex Jaeschke <rex at rexjaeschke.com>:
>
>> Good catch Caroline.
>>
>> DR 10-18 is the one that put the ODBC definition in Clause 4, which is
>> where
>> it belongs. It appears that when I implemented DR 13-07, which is that one
>> that put AutoFilter, MDX, and OLAP in 12.1, I seem to have also put a copy
>> of ODBC there.
>>
>> The simple solution is to remove ODBC from 12.1 (item 10), as Caroline
>> suggested.
>>
>> Rex
>>
>>
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Arms, Caroline [mailto:caar at loc.gov]
>> Sent: Thursday, December 11, 2014 8:09 AM
>> To: 'Rex Jaeschke'; SC 34 WG4
>> Subject: RE: Finals Drafts of the DCOR Set for 29500 Parts 1 and 4
>>
>> Rex,
>>
>> I just noticed one thing on a skim.  It looks as though the Part 1 changes
>> (#4 and #10) result in the ODBC entry being in both Terms and Definitions
>> AND in the SpreadsheetML-specific Terms.  Other changes seem to be
>> intended
>> to remove duplication of definitions.   I do find a mention of ODBC in
>> 17.14.10 and 17.16.5.12 and more -- in WordprocessingML.  So maybe it
>> should
>> be dropped from  the insertions in #10.
>>
>> Today, I will be trying to join the call by cellphone while we are
>> traveling.  If weather or coverage is bad, I may not make it.
>>
>>      Hope to talk to you.   Caroline
>>
>> Caroline Arms
>> Library of Congress Contractor
>> Co-compiler of Sustainability of Digital Formats resource
>> http://www.digitalpreservation.gov/formats/
>>
>> ** Views expressed are personal and not necessarily those of the
>> institution
>> **
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Rex Jaeschke [mailto:rex at RexJaeschke.com]
>> Sent: Friday, December 05, 2014 5:11 PM
>> To: SC 34 WG4
>> Cc: TC45
>> Subject: Finals Drafts of the DCOR Set for 29500 Parts 1 and 4
>>
>> On our next WG4 teleconference (2014-12-11), we'll (hopefully) agree to
>> forward the attached DCORs to Kimura-san for a 90-day SC 34 ballot.
>>
>> Assuming that ballot completes without the need for any (non-trivial)
>> comment resolution, I'll then start work on integrating these edits into
>> the
>> base documents to produce a consolidated reprint of these two Parts (which
>> will need no further balloting).
>>
>> Rex
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
> --
>
> Praying for the victims of the Japan Tohoku earthquake
>
> Makoto
>



-- 

Praying for the victims of the Japan Tohoku earthquake

Makoto
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.vse.cz/pipermail/sc34wg4/attachments/20141212/db345208/attachment.html>