Which RFC(s) for media type should we refer to?
Arms, Caroline
caar at loc.gov
Mon Oct 20 23:04:53 CEST 2014
All,
I started back on the Content type vs. Media type issue and ran into the question of which RFC(s) we should refer to, thinking that would be a good place to start thinking about rewording things. It's not so simple!
Part 2 currently refers to RFC 2616, which may not have been the most appropriate RFC but that is now moot, because 2616 is obsolete and has been replaced by a group of RFCs including RFC 7231 which refers to RFC 2046 in its Media Type subclause but does not elaborate on what media-type actually is. RFC 7231 provides ABNF for media-type, but you need to refer to RFC 7230 for an explanation of "OWS" -- used in the ABNF. RFC 2046 lists the top-level media types and common subtypes. It discusses parameters. Its introduction refers to RFC 2045 for the Content Type context and to RFC 822 for all relevant ABNF not found in its Appendix A: Collected Grammar. Media-type is not mentioned in Appendix A. RFC 2045 has a copy of the relevant ABNF from RFC 822.
More detailed detective work with URLs is attached below.
The question will be how best to refer to this in Part 2. RFC 7231 is most convenient for getting the ABNF syntax, but you need RFC 2046 to understand the semantics.
To be continued, no doubt ...
Caroline
Caroline Arms
Library of Congress Contractor
Co-compiler of Sustainability of Digital Formats resource http://www.digitalpreservation.gov/formats/
** Views expressed are personal and not necessarily those of the institution **
==== DETAILED detective work ====
Part 2 currently refers to RFC 2616
https://www.mnot.net/blog/2014/06/07/rfc2616_is_dead
http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc2616 is marked as obsolete
So I went to one of the replacement RFCs
http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7231
3.1.1.1. Media Type
HTTP uses Internet media types [RFC2046] in the Content-Type
(Section 3.1.1.5) and Accept (Section 5.3.2) header fields in order
to provide open and extensible data typing and type negotiation.
Media types define both a data format and various processing models:
how to process that data in accordance with each context in which it
is received.
media-type = type "/" subtype *( OWS ";" OWS parameter )
type = token
subtype = token
The type/subtype MAY be followed by parameters in the form of
name=value pairs.
parameter = token "=" ( token / quoted-string )
The type, subtype, and parameter name tokens are case-insensitive.
Parameter values might or might not be case-sensitive, depending on
the semantics of the parameter name. The presence or absence of a
parameter might be significant to the processing of a media-type,
depending on its definition within the media type registry.
A parameter value that matches the token production can be
transmitted either as a token or within a quoted-string. The quoted
and unquoted values are equivalent. For example, the following
examples are all equivalent, but the first is preferred for
consistency:
text/html;charset=utf-8
text/html;charset=UTF-8
Text/HTML;Charset="utf-8"
text/html; charset="utf-8"
Internet media types ought to be registered with IANA according to
the procedures defined in [BCP13].
Note: Unlike some similar constructs in other header fields, media
type parameters do not allow whitespace (even "bad" whitespace)
around the "=" character.
=== aside on OWS -- optional whitespace ===
OWS = <OWS, see [RFC7230], Section 3.2.3>
http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7230#section-3.2.3
3.2.3. Whitespace
This specification uses three rules to denote the use of linear
whitespace: OWS (optional whitespace), RWS (required whitespace), and
BWS ("bad" whitespace).
The OWS rule is used where zero or more linear whitespace octets
might appear. For protocol elements where optional whitespace is
preferred to improve readability, a sender SHOULD generate the
optional whitespace as a single SP; otherwise, a sender SHOULD NOT
generate optional whitespace except as needed to white out invalid or
unwanted protocol elements during in-place message filtering.
The RWS rule is used when at least one linear whitespace octet is
required to separate field tokens. A sender SHOULD generate RWS as a
single SP.
The BWS rule is used where the grammar allows optional whitespace
only for historical reasons. A sender MUST NOT generate BWS in
messages. A recipient MUST parse for such bad whitespace and remove
it before interpreting the protocol element.
OWS = *( SP / HTAB )
; optional whitespace
RWS = 1*( SP / HTAB )
; required whitespace
BWS = OWS
; "bad" whitespace
==== end of OWS digression
http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc2046
Multipurpose Internet Mail Extensions (MIME) Part Two: Media Types
Introduction
The first document in this set, RFC 2045, defines a number of header
fields, including Content-Type. The Content-Type field is used to
specify the nature of the data in the body of a MIME entity, by
giving media type and subtype identifiers, and by providing auxiliary
information that may be required for certain media types. After the
type and subtype names, the remainder of the header field is simply a
set of parameters, specified in an attribute/value notation. The
ordering of parameters is not significant.
In general, the top-level media type is used to declare the general
type of data, while the subtype specifies a specific format for that
type of data. Thus, a media type of "image/xyz" is enough to tell a
user agent that the data is an image, even if the user agent has no
knowledge of the specific image format "xyz". Such information can
be used, for example, to decide whether or not to show a user the raw
data from an unrecognized subtype -- such an action might be
reasonable for unrecognized subtypes of "text", but not for
unrecognized subtypes of "image" or "audio". For this reason,
registered subtypes of "text", "image", "audio", and "video" should
not contain embedded information that is really of a different type.
Such compound formats should be represented using the "multipart" or
"application" types.
Parameters are modifiers of the media subtype, and as such do not
fundamentally affect the nature of the content. The set of
meaningful parameters depends on the media type and subtype. Most
parameters are associated with a single specific subtype. However, a
given top-level media type may define parameters which are applicable
to any subtype of that type. Parameters may be required by their
defining media type or subtype or they may be optional. MIME
implementations must also ignore any parameters whose names they do
not recognize.
RFC 2046 lists the top-level media types and their subtypes. As shown in the excerpt above, it refers to RFC 2045 for the Content Type header field in the Introduction.
ABNF for media type is not defined in RFC 2046 but is defined in RFC
2045 which copies it from RFC 822. RFC 2046 has a Collected Grammar appendix which refers to RFC 822.
http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc2045#page-12
5.1. Syntax of the Content-Type Header Field
In the Augmented BNF notation of RFC 822, a Content-Type header field
value is defined as follows:
content := "Content-Type" ":" type "/" subtype
*(";" parameter)
; Matching of media type and subtype
; is ALWAYS case-insensitive.
type := discrete-type / composite-type
discrete-type := "text" / "image" / "audio" / "video" /
"application" / extension-token
composite-type := "message" / "multipart" / extension-token
extension-token := ietf-token / x-token
ietf-token := <An extension token defined by a
standards-track RFC and registered
with IANA.>
x-token := <The two characters "X-" or "x-" followed, with
no intervening white space, by any token>
subtype := extension-token / iana-token
iana-token := <A publicly-defined extension token. Tokens
of this form must be registered with IANA
as specified in RFC 2048.>
parameter := attribute "=" value
attribute := token
; Matching of attributes
; is ALWAYS case-insensitive.
value := token / quoted-string
token := 1*<any (US-ASCII) CHAR except SPACE, CTLs,
or tspecials>
tspecials := "(" / ")" / "<" / ">" / "@" /
"," / ";" / ":" / "\" / <">
"/" / "[" / "]" / "?" / "="
; Must be in quoted-string,
; to use within parameter values
More information about the sc34wg4
mailing list