Part 2 schema regex for ST_ContentType

[MURATA Makoto]

John,

>
> After the meetings, I took a similar look at the regex, compared it to RFC
> 2616 (the regex is intended to match the RFC), compared RFCs 2616 and 7231
> and documented everything in the attached.  (This includes a fix to the
> error Murata-san noted.)  The e-mail discussion is included below.
>
>
>

Actually,

X+/X+(\s*;\s*(X+=(X+|("(Y|(\\[\p{IsBasicLatin}])*)"))))*

should become

X+/X+(\s*;\s*(X+=(X+|("(Y|(\\[\p{IsBasicLatin}]))*"))))*

Regards,
Makoto
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.vse.cz/pipermail/sc34wg4/attachments/20150407/87f66307/attachment.html>