Minor mistakes in DR 14-0010
Rex Jaeschke
rex at RexJaeschke.com
Mon Jul 6 23:30:14 CEST 2015
>From a quick look:
In the COR applied to 29500:2008 to make 29500:2011, we added (at least) the types EG_PContentMath, CT_MathCtrlIns, and CT_MathCtrlDel, but did not create a new descriptive subclause for them. However, these are NOT simple types.
However, in the COR applied to 29500:2011 to make 29500:2012, we added the type ST_XmlName, and did create a new descriptive subclause for it in Simple Types.
Rex
From: eb2mmrt at gmail.com [mailto:eb2mmrt at gmail.com] On Behalf Of MURATA Makoto
Sent: Friday, July 3, 2015 9:18 AM
To: SC34
Subject: Re: Minor mistakes in DR 14-0010
I am wondering if DR 14-0040 should be reopened.
The solution the DR log introduces a simple type
in sml.xsd but does not introduce a new subclasue
of 18.18 Simple Types.
I am also wondering if we have made this error
before. I will check all simple types in the latest
schemas.
Regards,
Makoto
2015-07-01 17:25 GMT+09:00 MURATA Makoto <eb2m-mrt at asahi-net.or.jp <mailto:eb2m-mrt at asahi-net.or.jp> >:
I find two errors in schema fragments in this closed DR.
First, xsd:Integer should be replaced by xsd:nonNegativeInteger.
Second, <simpleType> should be replaced by </xsd:simpleType>.
Regards,
Makoto
--
Praying for the victims of the Japan Tohoku earthquake
Makoto
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.vse.cz/pipermail/sc34wg4/attachments/20150706/62704569/attachment-0001.html>
More information about the sc34wg4
mailing list