PLEASE PROOF: Final Drafts of 29500-1:2015 and 29500-4:2015 Posted to the SC 34/WG4 Site for Proofing. Feedback due by 2015-07-10

Sun Jul 12 20:55:32 CEST 2015

#216

Agreed; that sentence was in the COR but not in the consolidated draft. I’ll add it.

#222

I agree, I got it wrong in the XSD, but right in the RelaxNG. I’ll fix that.

Rex

From: eb2mmrt at gmail.com [mailto:eb2mmrt at gmail.com] On Behalf Of MURATA Makoto
Sent: Sunday, July 12, 2015 6:36 AM
To: SC 34 WG4
Subject: Re: PLEASE PROOF: Final Drafts of 29500-1:2015 and 29500-4:2015 Posted to the SC 34/WG4 Site for Proofing. Feedback due by 2015-07-10

#216

A sentence should be added to the first para.

 This value is used as one piece of information to guide selection of a similar alternate font if the 

desired font is unavailable. 

#222

The default value is not "nlCheck" but "off"

#222 is my last so far.

Regards,

Makoto

2015-07-11 8:21 GMT+09:00 John Haug <johnhaug at exchange.microsoft.com <mailto:johnhaug at exchange.microsoft.com> >:

Rex, if you don’t mind ignoring your request for comments by tomorrow, I can look at some of these next week.

Which items did you review, Murata-san?  You said you started with #146 (18.17.7.242, I believe) and the highest number you commented on is #198.

John

From: Rex Jaeschke [mailto:rex at RexJaeschke.com <mailto:rex at RexJaeschke.com> ] 
Sent: Thursday, July 9, 2015 12:33 PM
To: 'SC 34 WG4'
Subject: RE: PLEASE PROOF: Final Drafts of 29500-1:2015 and 29500-4:2015 Posted to the SC 34/WG4 Site for Proofing. Feedback due by 2015-07-10

See my responses in-line. I disagree with one and don’t understand one other.

Rex

From: eb2mmrt at gmail.com <mailto:eb2mmrt at gmail.com>  [mailto:eb2mmrt at gmail.com] On Behalf Of MURATA Makoto
Sent: Friday, July 3, 2015 9:27 AM
To: SC 34 WG4
Subject: Re: PLEASE PROOF: Final Drafts of 29500-1:2015 and 29500-4:2015 Posted to the SC 34/WG4 Site for Proofing. Feedback due by 2015-07-10

#198

This change was correctly incorporated, but the indentation in the 

consolidated Part 1 is too much.

Rex> Agreed; will fix.

Regards,

Makoto

2015-07-03 17:25 GMT+09:00 MURATA Makoto <eb2m-mrt at asahi-net.or.jp <mailto:eb2m-mrt at asahi-net.or.jp> >:

Rex,

I began with #146 of Part1.  I will send more.

#152

The second bullet in #152 in the COR to Part 1 lacks a verb "is".

Although this does not exist in the COR, I think that this 

editorial error can be fixed.

Rex> Agreed; will fix.

#155

The COR is correct, but the consolidated text does not 

incorporate this change.

Rex> Disagree; I see the fix applied in both the DOCX and PDF versions.

#169

This change was correctly incorporated, but the layout 

is broken. See 18.17.7.342 in Part 1.

Rex> Agreed; the trailing newline should be restored. Will fix.

#174-176

"unit face value" should be replaced by "units face value".

Rex> Agreed; will fix.

#177

This change was correctly incorporated, but the layout 

is broken. See 18.17.7.356 in Part 1.

Rex> Agreed; the trailing newline should be restored. Will fix.

#187

Is notesMaster actually a notes master?  This is for 

both the DCOR text and the consolidated text.

Rex> I don’t understand your question. Are your suggesting the DR resolution in this regard is incorrect?

Regards,
Makoto

2015-06-04 0:58 GMT+09:00 Rex Jaeschke <rex at rexjaeschke.com <mailto:rex at rexjaeschke.com> >:

Some months ago, balloting ended on CORs for Parts 1 and 4 of 29500. Both ballots passed.

I have applied the edits in each COR to the corresponding standard from 2012 to create a 2015 edition. As this new edition contains no new material beyond what was adopted in the ballots, no further balloting is necessary; this is an editorial task.

However, before I submit the final versions to ISO for publication, I’m giving WG4 (and Ecma TC45) members a chance to review the final drafts to make sure I applied all the edits correctly. In the case of Part 1, there are some 250 sets of edits. I don’t expect members to check all of them, but if each member randomly chose 10 of them and checked those, we’ll likely get good coverage.

The changes are tracked, and both DOCX and PDF versions are included for each Part. Don’t be concerned if you see some bright blue edits, as they will be “fixed” when I finally adopt the tracked changes.

Part 4 contains some manual pointers into Part 1, but these have not yet been updated. I will do that once Part 1’s tracked changes have been adopted, and that Part is frozen.

I have posted to Livelink the 49-MB and 13-MB zip files as documents 2015-0309 and 2015-0310, respectively. Only registered members can access these.

Rex Jaeschke, 29500 Project Editor

-- 

Praying for the victims of the Japan Tohoku earthquake

Makoto

-- 

Praying for the victims of the Japan Tohoku earthquake

Makoto

-- 

Praying for the victims of the Japan Tohoku earthquake

Makoto

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.vse.cz/pipermail/sc34wg4/attachments/20150712/da93e6f6/attachment-0001.html>