ST_PitchFamily in dml-main.xsd

[MURATA Makoto]

I also think that we should not address this issue in the upcoming
consolidated edition, particularly because we have to create some new
subclause for
added types such as ST_PitchFamily.


Regards,
Makoto

2015-07-13 4:17 GMT+09:00 Rex Jaeschke <rex at rexjaeschke.com>:

> After looking at COR2 and DR 09-0055, I conclude that none of the edits
> proposed in DR 09-0055 after the heading “2011-06-03 Chris Rae:” and before
> the heading “2011-06-20/22 Berlin Meeting:” were incorporated into COR2, so
> were not integrated into the resulting new standard edition. And this is
> what John has also deduced.
>
>
>
> The only edits that went into COR2 were for the Part 1 and 4 schemas.
> Clearly, the type should have been there too, and probably all of the
> missing bits John and I have identified.
>
>
>
> As this is unrelated to the current task---that of integrating COR3---I
> propose we deal with it via a new DR.
>
>
>
> While it might seem opportune to “sneak it in here”, remember that this
> integration can only involve applying COR3 to the 2012 base; any other
> technical changes would require a ballot of some sort.
>
>
>
> Rex
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* eb2mmrt at gmail.com [mailto:eb2mmrt at gmail.com] *On Behalf Of *MURATA
> Makoto
> *Sent:* Sunday, July 12, 2015 2:23 AM
> *To:* SC34
> *Subject:* Re: ST_PitchFamily in dml-main.xsd
>
>
>
> John finds that some changes in DR 09-0055
>
> are not incorporated.  This is a big surprise to
>
> me, but John appears to be correct.
>
>
>
> First, I checked the schema branch for COR2 to Part 1.
>
> I added the simple type ST_PitchFamily to dml-main.xsd
>
> on 2011-02-17.  The commit was dedicated to DR 09-0055.
>
> No other commits appear to have touched this simple type.
>
>
>
> I first thought that there must be another DR for
>
> Panose fonts.  Yes, we have DR 09-0061.  But
>
> its content does not touch the solution in DR 09-0055.
>
> Then, I thought the AMD1 or AMD2 reverted the
>
> change.  No, they did not.  Rex, do you have any ideas?
>
> Regards,
>
> Makoto
>
>
>
> 2015-07-11 8:09 GMT+09:00 John Haug <johnhaug at exchange.microsoft.com>:
>
> Yikes, what did you dig up…!  There’s a limit to what I can find on this.
> It appears a DR may not have been handled correctly years ago.  See WG 4 N
> 0230 for the change-tracked Part 1 COR 2 final draft.  The only DRs I can
> find that touch this simple type (and that may not be complete) are
> 09-0037, 09-0055 and 09-0056.  56 defers to 55 (
> https://onedrive.live.com/view.aspx/Public%20Documents/2009/DR-09-0055.docx?cid=C8BA0861DC5E4ADC
> ).
>
>
>
> 09-0037 deletes in 19.2.1.13 font at charset, font at panose and
> font at pitchFamily; agreed in Stockholm in March 2010.  DR 09-0055 makes
> numerous changes; Chris’ changes of 2011-06-03 agreed in Berlin in June
> 2011.  Those changes in 09-0055 are not reflected in the draft in N 0230 or
> in Rex’s private COR drafts with DR traceback references.  I’m not sure
> what drove the changes in N 0230 – another DR I haven’t found or just an
> incorrect application of edits.
>
>
>
> Here’s what I can piece together so far.
>
>
>
> DR 09-0055 does… | N 0230 does…
>
> 19.2.1.13 font:
>
> changes @pitchFamily | deletes @charset, @panose, @pitchFamily (references
> DR 09-0037 in Rex's private DR traceback doc)
>
> 20.1.10.87 ST_PitchFamily:
>
> adds this new ST | does not exist
>
> 21.1.2.3.1 cs:
>
> changes @pitchFamily | no changes
>
> 21.1.2.3.3 ea:
>
> changes @pitchFamily | no changes
>
> 21.1.2.3.7 latin:
>
> changes @pitchFamily (incl. removing a note) | adds the note (no DR
> referenced in Rex's doc)
>
> 21.1.2.3.10 sym:
>
> changes @pitchFamily (incl. removing a note) | adds the note (no DR
> referenced in Rex's doc)
>
> 21.1.2.4.6 buFont:
>
> changes @pitchFamily (incl. removing a note) | no changes (the note
> already exists)
>
>
>
> Does anyone have any memory of this?
>
>
>
> John
>
>
>
> *From:* eb2mmrt at gmail.com [mailto:eb2mmrt at gmail.com] *On Behalf Of *MURATA
> Makoto
> *Sent:* Saturday, July 4, 2015 1:55 AM
> *To:* SC34
> *Subject:* ST_PitchFamily in dml-main.xsd
>
>
>
> Dear colleagues,
>
>
>
> I checked all simple types in Part 1 XSD schemas.  All simple types
>
> are documented in Part 1.  The only exception is ST_PitchFamily in
>
> dml-main.xsd.  This simple type was introduced as part of COR2.
>
>
>
> Regards,
>
> Makoto
>
>
>
>
>
> --
>
>
> Praying for the victims of the Japan Tohoku earthquake
>
> Makoto
>



-- 

Praying for the victims of the Japan Tohoku earthquake

Makoto
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.vse.cz/pipermail/sc34wg4/attachments/20150713/f62c8e89/attachment-0001.html>