PLEASE PROOF: Drafts of 29500-1/-4:2016; feedback due by the end of 2016-04-29

[MURATA Makoto]

Why is the header of Subclause 10.8 of Part 1 indented?

Regards,
Makoto

2016-03-30 0:42 GMT+09:00 Rex Jaeschke <rex at rexjaeschke.com>:

> I just posted the following new documents to the WG4 website:
>
>
>
> ·       N 0333: 29500-1:2016 in DOCX and PDF, schemas and other
> electronic annexes [61MB]
>
> ·       N 0334: 29500-4:2016 in DOCX and PDF, schemas [12MB]
>
>
>
> These documents are 29500-1/-4:2012 with CORs 1 and 2 applied.
>
>
>
> Please post any corrections/suggestions to this list.
>
>
>
> About a year ago, we tried to publish 29500-1/-4:2015 after having
> incorporated COR1, but as we found errors, we produced a COR2. I built on
> last year’s work by simply applying COR2 to what we already had. That made
> some new changes and undid a few from COR1.
>
>
>
> For your convenience, CORs 1 and 2 are attached.
>
>
>
> I have applied all the editorial corrections reported (especially those
> documented in the Beijing meeting minutes from 2015).
>
>
>
> I updated the Part 4 pointers into Part 1 to reflect clause-number changes.
>
>
>
> I’ve asked Murata-san to get me the latest schemas, but as nothing was
> changed in that regard for COR2, what I posted today should be the final
> schemas.
>
>
>
> The review period ends on 2016-04-29. Hopefully, we can move these drafts
> to DIS ballots during the 2016-05-10 teleconference. We already got SC 34’s
> approval to do this at the Beijing Plenary. All being well, the ISO and
> Ecma editions will be published before year’s end.
>
>
>
> Rex
>
>
>
>
>



-- 

Praying for the victims of the Japan Tohoku earthquake

Makoto
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.vse.cz/pipermail/sc34wg4/attachments/20160413/6acf6dca/attachment-0001.html>