DR-16-0009: Pushback from Charlie after WG4 agreed to close this without action

[Rex Jaeschke]

-----Original Message-----
From: Charlie Clark [mailto:charlie.clark at clark-consulting.eu] 
Sent: Wednesday, December 14, 2016 7:59 AM
To: Rex Jaeschke <rex at rexjaeschke.com>
Subject: SPAM-LOW: Re: DR-16-0009: WG4 agreed to close this without action. See attached.

Am .12.2016, 18:55 Uhr, schrieb Rex Jaeschke <rex at rexjaeschke.com>:

Hi Rex,

I'm slightly confused by this. The suggestion was to remove an unrealistic normative assertion from the narrative description of the specification. I don't see how this can be interpreted as an extension. The important thing is that the descriptive and formal parts of the standard are in agreement wherever possible and here they most definitely are not.

The solutions I proposed:

	1) update the schema to match the description
	2) mark the current normative aspect of the description as exemplary
	3) remove the normative aspect of the description as it is misleading

Can you explain how any of these can be considered as an extension?

Charlie
--
Charlie Clark
Managing Director
Clark Consulting & Research
German Office
Kronenstr. 27a
D sseldorf
D- 40217
Tel: +49-211-600-3657
Mobile: +49-178-782-6226