Proposed appendix for page layout (including Kihon Hanmen)

[MURATA Makoto]

Caroline,

We first have to discuss whether it is a good idea to have one
appendix.  We might want to have more than one.  We might
want to move the content of the current appendix to existing
subclauses.

I heavily used the XPath notation, which has never been
used in Part 1.

Regards,
Makoto

2016-02-25 21:50 GMT+09:00 caroline arms <caroline.arms at gmail.com>:

> Murata-san,
>
> After any discussion of this appendix at the face-to-face (which, as
> usual, I will not be able to attend), I will be happy to offer additional
> suggestions for improving the English, correcting typos, etc.
>
> For now, I'll point out that the notation for elements and attributes may
> need explanation.  I don't remember this notation being used elsewhere in
> Part 1.  Also, references to clauses in the main text (e.g., to 17.6.5 for
> docGrid) or to locations in the schema may be helpful.
>
>   Enjoy Barcelona.
>
>   Caroline
>
> On Wed, Feb 24, 2016 at 10:46 PM, MURATA Makoto <eb2m-mrt at asahi-net.or.jp>
> wrote:
>
>> Dear colleagues,
>>
>> Here is a belated proposal for a new appendix in Part 1.  This
>> is intended to address DR 11-0008 thru -0011.
>>
>>
>> https://www.assembla.com/spaces/IS29500/documents/d6jO2g23er5zFdacwqjQXA/download/d6jO2g23er5zFdacwqjQXA
>>
>>
>>
>> Regards,
>> Makoto
>>
>
>


-- 

Praying for the victims of the Japan Tohoku earthquake

Makoto
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.vse.cz/pipermail/sc34wg4/attachments/20160226/5dd80eb5/attachment.html>