DR 10-0016 - SHOULD BE DR 10-0036!

[Francis Cave]

Ooops! My mistake! I should have been referring to DR 10-0036. I shouldn’t
write emails so late


 

Francis

 

 

 

From: Francis Cave <francis at franciscave.com> 
Sent: 10 January 2019 01:23
To: 'SC34' <e-SC34-WG4 at ecma-international.org>
Subject: DR 10-0016

 

Hi folks

 

Happy New Year!

 

DR 10-0016, originally submitted by Alex Brown, was re-assigned to me at the
meeting last September.

 

I have come to two conclusions:

 

1.	The problem with ‘docPart’ is that the meaning of the term “document
part” in §17.5.2.9 through §17.5.2.14 is mostly different from elsewhere in
the text. Much of the confusion would be cleared up by changing the heading
of §17.5.2.9 to “docPart (Glossary Document Entry Reference)”, and in the
narrative text of §17.5 changing all instances of “document part” to
“glossary document entry”.
2.	Generally, I agree with Murata-san that changes are mostly not
needed to disambiguate other elements that have different meanings and
content models in different contexts. However, there are some exceptions. I
suggest that these be handled in a separate DR, which I will submit in due
course.

 

Regards,

 

Francis

 

Click here <https://www.mailcontrol.com/sr/MZbqvYs5QwJvpeaetUwhCQ==>  to
report this email as spam.

 

This message has been scanned for malware by Forcepoint.
<http://www.forcepoint.com/> www.forcepoint.com

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.vse.cz/pipermail/sc34wg4/attachments/20190110/e8ffdbf5/attachment.html>