DR-09-0034 (was "Re: DR-09-0032 and DR-09-0034")

[MURATA Makoto (FAMILY Given)]

Shawn,

I didn't know the web form you mentioned, but it is mentioned 
in RFC 4288.  Thank you for enlightening me.

Here is my first cut.

Required parameters

None.


Optional parameters

charset, as specified in 3.2 of RFC 3023.


Encoding considerations

The same as in application/xml (3.2 of RFC 3023).


Security considerations

The same as in application/xml (3.2 of RFC 3023).


Interoperability considerations

The same as in application/xml (3.2 of RFC 3023).


Published Specification

ISO/IEC 29500:2008, Part X, Clause X.X.X


Applications using this type

OOXML applications

Magic number(s)

None

File extension(s)
xml

Mac File Type(s)

"TEXT"

OID(s)

???? (I do not understand.  Can we simply skip this field?)

Intended usage

Common



We might want to say that OOXML documents are zip files and that our
media types are labels for files within such zip files.  By the way, 
when the pack URI scheme is used to reference to files within OOXML 
zip files, will our media types be returned?

Although we can directly contact IANA, I think we should first send a
proposal to the IETF-type ML.

Cheers,

-- 
MURATA Makoto (FAMILY Given) <EB2M-MRT at asahi-net.or.jp>