My action item: Letter to the W3C Web Applications WG

[MURATA Makoto (FAMILY Given)]

Wearing my expert hat....

> 2) Terminology differences frequently cause problems for users of standards.  The 
> OPC specification includes conceptual terms and references potentially
> relevant to the Widgets specification, notably in areas such as the ZIP
> subset, part concept, the part-to-name mapping, the pack scheme and
> UTF-8 usage. We commend consideration of these to the Web Applications
> WG.

Japan recently submitted several DRs about OPC (09-0280 thru 09-0293).
I believe that terms and concepts in OPC are sometimes chaotic and have
to be revisited.

I think that WG4 experts should review both OPC and Widget packaging and 
propose specific changes to the Web Applications WG rather than asking 
them to learn from 29500-2.

Cheers,
Makoto