ST_HoleSizePercent in Part1 FPDAM1 and Part 4 FPDAM1

[Shawn Villaron]

Great bug.  We need to correct this, although I need to investigate why we have this bug …

Thanks for forwarding.

From: Innovimax SARL [mailto:innovimax at gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, January 13, 2010 12:23 AM
To: MURATA Makoto (FAMILY Given)
Cc: SC 34 WG4
Subject: Re: ST_HoleSizePercent in Part1 FPDAM1 and Part 4 FPDAM1

My understanding is that it is a defect since it doesn't allow to represent 1 to 9 in Transitional

Mohamed
On Wed, Jan 13, 2010 at 2:24 AM, MURATA Makoto (FAMILY Given) <eb2m-mrt at asahi-net.or.jp<mailto:eb2m-mrt at asahi-net.or.jp>> wrote:
Why are ST_HoleSizePercent in Part1 FPDAM1 and that in Part 4 FPDAM1
different?

Strict

 <xsd:simpleType name="ST_HoleSizePercent">
   <xsd:restriction base="xsd:string">
     <xsd:pattern value="0*([1-9]|([1-8][0-9])|90)%"/>
   </xsd:restriction>
 </xsd:simpleType>

Transitional

 <xsd:simpleType name="ST_HoleSizePercent">
   <xsd:restriction base="xsd:string">
     <xsd:pattern value="0*(([1-8][0-9])|90)%"/>
   </xsd:restriction>
 </xsd:simpleType>


Cheers,
Makoto



--
Innovimax SARL
Consulting, Training & XML Development
9, impasse des Orteaux
75020 Paris
Tel : +33 9 52 475787
Fax : +33 1 4356 1746
http://www.innovimax.fr
RCS Paris 488.018.631
SARL au capital de 10.000 €
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.vse.cz/pipermail/sc34wg4/attachments/20100119/142d0204/attachment.htm>