DR 09-0168 ? OPC: No mechanism to distinguish ECMA-376:2006 from IS 29500
MURATA Makoto (FAMILY Given)
eb2m-mrt at asahi-net.or.jp
Thu Nov 18 05:23:22 CET 2010
> In my notes I've written that in Tokyo we decided I'd look into whether we could alter Part 4 to disbar non-ASCII part names, thereby making it homogenous with ECMA-376 and removing the requirement for Transitional IS 29500 to be differentiated from ECMA-376.
I do not think that we have to borrow some text from Part 2 and
reformulate it. Part 4 can simply specify its own restrictions on
But exactly what is the difference between the first edition Ecma OPC
and ISO/IEC 29500-2:2008? I am comparing these two documents, but
I do not quite understand the difference. "9.1.1 Part Names" has
been significantly expaned but Appendix A "Resolving Unicode Strings
to Part Names " existed from the beginning. One could argue that
the use of non-ASCII characters is allowed from the beginning. I
am totally confused.
More information about the sc34wg4