DR 11-0012 - WML: Absence of the type attribute of the docGrid element
Chris.Rae at microsoft.com
Thu Jun 16 00:36:21 CEST 2011
Hi Jesper -
I think we do have to describe what the behaviour should be when the attribute is missing (given that it's optional) but I'd be happy to put the text I had in an informative note into Microsoft's implementer notes instead. That was actually what I was initially thinking of doing with this DR, but I felt that "if this is missing, it's like the parent was missing" rather begs the question "then why not just omit the parent", so I thought implementers might benefit from some sort of description.
That said, I'm certainly open to putting that information in implementer notes if WG4 think it would be better there.
From: Jesper Lund Stocholm [mailto:jesper.stocholm at ciber.dk]
Sent: 15 June 2011 05:10
To: Chris Rae; e-SC34-WG4 at ecma-international.org
Subject: RE: DR 11-0012 - WML: Absence of the type attribute of the docGrid element
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE AND NOTICE REGARDING NO ELECTRONIC SIGNATURE: The materials in this electronic transmission (including attachments) may be subject to attorney-client or work product privilege, may be private and confidential and are the property of the sender. The information contained is intended only for the named addressee(s) and should not be considered evidence of intent to be bound to any agreement. The taking of any action in reliance on the contents is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient of this message, please immediately notify the sender and promptly delete this message.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Chris Rae [mailto:Chris.Rae at microsoft.com]
> Sent: Saturday, June 11, 2011 2:32 AM
> To: e-SC34-WG4 at ecma-international.org
> Subject: DR 11-0012 - WML: Absence of the type attribute of the
> This DR requests clarification of what the absence of the "type"
> of the docGrid element means. The standard is definitely unclear -
> checked with our experts and essentially a missing "type" attribute is
> equivalent to a completely missing docGrid element. The reason for
> duplicitous behaviour is to enable the other docGrid settings to be
> preserved even when the docGrid feature is turned off (allowing the
> user to turn on and off the feature without losing the settings
> to it). I've added text to the standard describing the behaviour,
> with an informative note explaining why this would be useful. Changes
Doesn't this sound like it would be more appropriate in a vendor's implementer notes than in the standard itself? It seems like the behavior described here is orthogonal to the type attribute itself and the stated purpose of it in the current text?
Med venlig hilsen / Best regards
Jesper Lund Stocholm
CIBER Danmark A/S
Mobil: +45 3094 5570
Email: jesper.stocholm at ciber.dk
More information about the sc34wg4