Draft Report of teleconference, 2010-11-17

[Alex Brown]

Rex hi

Yes, it is a little unusual -- it was prompted by queries about who had signed-up for the study period and is just a compact way of showing that information. Alternatively I suppose I could have made a report in the meeting on interest in the activity (i.e. who had joined the list) and then minuted that. The split between the study activity and "normal" WG 1 is just to avoid having to list all the WG 1 (mailing list) "members" ... which is a big list.

I notice in the new Directives the term "study period" seems to have gone to be replaced by "preliminary stage". And you're right we should steer clear of the term "study group" - I will remove this.

Thanks,

- Alex.


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Rex Jaeschke [mailto:rex at RexJaeschke.com]
> Sent: 24 November 2010 18:47
> To: Alex Brown; 'ISO Zip'
> Cc: dsdl-discuss at dsdl.org
> Subject: RE: Draft Report of teleconference, 2010-11-17
> 
> Feedback on the minutes
> 
> 
> Regarding Attendance, it seems quite odd to list the people who are on the
> ZIP mailing list but who did not attend (like myself). Presumably this was a
> WG1 teleconference, in which case I would expect to see all the WG1 NB and
> liaison members who attended plus invited guests, if any, without
> distinguishing who was there for WG1 and who was there for the ZIP stuff
> only.
> 
> The term "study group" has meaning in JTC 1, so I suggest '"Zip" study group'
> be changed to '"Zip" study period" as that was the title of the activity
> authorized by SC 34.
> 
> Rex
> 
> ----------------
> Rex Jaeschke
> IS 29500 Project Editor
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: sc34wg1study-bounces at vse.cz [mailto:sc34wg1study-
> bounces at vse.cz]
> > On Behalf Of Alex Brown
> > Sent: Tuesday, November 23, 2010 11:33 AM
> > To: ISO Zip
> > Cc: dsdl-discuss at dsdl.org
> > Subject: Draft Report of teleconference, 2010-11-17
> >
> > Dear all,
> >
> > Please find a draft report of last week's WG 1 teleconference attached.
> > Please let me have your corrections.
> >
> > For participants not on the call, please note that a strong consensus
> > emerged that producing a "profile standard" seemed like the best way
> > forward for bringing Zip into a standards environment, and that work
> > is underway drafting some text for a NWIP proposing this.
> >
> > This "profile standard" is envisaged as an International Standard
> > which references the PKWare appnote using the RER mechanism, and
> which
> > provides its own constraints, clarifications, etc.
> >
> > - Alex.
> >
> > --
> > Alex Brown
> > Convenor, ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC 34/WG 1
> > Editor, ISO/IEC 19757-1 (DSDL Overview) Editor, ISO/IEC 19757-5
> > (Extensible Datatypes)
> >
> >
> __________________________________________________________
> ____________
> > This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System.
> > For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email
> >
> __________________________________________________________
> ____________
> 
> 
> 
> 
> __________________________________________________________
> ____________
> This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System.
> For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email
> __________________________________________________________
> ____________

______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System.
For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email 
______________________________________________________________________