Draft NWIP

[robert_weir at us.ibm.com]

Were there any other comments on the substance of the NWIP draft?  I 
understand that there is some time pressure to get the proposal submitted 
for the Plenary agenda.  So please forward along any additional comments, 
say by the EOD Friday, and I'll send out a revised draft.

Regards,

-Rob

"MURATA Makoto (FAMILY Given)" <eb2m-mrt at asahi-net.or.jp> wrote on 
12/20/2010 05:34:41 PM:

> 
> > We wanted to make it clear that the NWIP was for only a single part of 

> > what could eventually be a multipart.  But future parts would need 
their 
> > own NWIPs or subdivisions.  How do we express this?
> 
> By submitting a NWIP for a multi-part standard containig a single part.
> Future parts can be started by project dubdivisions or a NWIP.  I don't 
> believe that it is possible to convert a non-multi-part standard to a 
> multi-part standard later.  All what we can do is to add more parts.
> 
> Cheers,
> Makoto