DR 08-0002 and DR 08-0003 (Was Re: Material for next week's WG4 Teleconference: Proposed Responses to DRs 08-0001 through 08-0008, and 09-0033)

[Shawn Villaron]

I believe the intent of the change was to keep the meaning -- and precision -- of the example the same pre/post BRM6.  So, the pre-BRM6 example showed 10000 which was equivalent to 10.000%.  Given they're just examples, I'd be happy to change these.  I'll take a note.

-----Original Message-----
From: Jirka Kosek [mailto:jirka at kosek.cz] 
Sent: Monday, April 27, 2009 1:21 PM
To: Rex Jaeschke
Cc: SC 34 WG4
Subject: DR 08-0002 and DR 08-0003 (Was Re: Material for next week's WG4 Teleconference: Proposed Responses to DRs 08-0001 through 08-0008, and 09-0033)

Rex Jaeschke wrote:

> Please post any and all questions or comments regarding this document 
> to this email list as soon as possible, so we have a good chance of 
> closing these DRs on the phone call.

It doesn't make sense to show integer percentage values with several zero decimal digits in examples. I propose to change 10.000% and 100.000% to 10% and 100%. And similar change should be made in DR 08-0003.

					Jirka

--
------------------------------------------------------------------
  Jirka Kosek      e-mail: jirka at kosek.cz      http://xmlguru.cz
------------------------------------------------------------------
       Professional XML consulting and training services
  DocBook customization, custom XSLT/XSL-FO document processing
------------------------------------------------------------------
 OASIS DocBook TC member, W3C Invited Expert, ISO JTC1/SC34 member
------------------------------------------------------------------