DR 09-0219: WML: Custom XML Attribute
Innovimax SARL
innovimax at gmail.com
Thu Jun 11 08:19:02 CEST 2009
I was also wondering why we have such limitation.
Following our current rules it would go to a Amendment since it restrict the
space of allowed documents
Mohamed
On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 6:48 AM, MURATA Makoto (FAMILY Given) <
eb2m-mrt at asahi-net.or.jp> wrote:
> > In shared-simpleTypes.xsd:
> >
> > <xsd:simpleType name="ST_XmlName">
> > <xsd:restriction base="xsd:NCName">
> > <xsd:minLength value="1"/>
> > <xsd:maxLength value="255"/>
> > </xsd:restriction>
> > </xsd:simpleType>
>
> Do we really need the maxLength facets? After all, Part 3 already
> allows foreign elements without imposing any restrictions on
> the length of local names.
>
> Cheers,
> Makoto
>
--
Innovimax SARL
Consulting, Training & XML Development
9, impasse des Orteaux
75020 Paris
Tel : +33 9 52 475787
Fax : +33 1 4356 1746
http://www.innovimax.fr
RCS Paris 488.018.631
SARL au capital de 10.000 €
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.vse.cz/pipermail/sc34wg4/attachments/20090611/5d90dc66/attachment.htm>
More information about the sc34wg4
mailing list