PLEASE PROOF: Day 2 Draft Minutes of the Bellevue Meeting

[Rex Jaeschke]

Jesper, I don't recall that any decisions were made regarding this topic.
You presented your document, and during the discussions that followed, I
mentioned the approach that I was investigating. I'm looking at using
29500-related technology as the vehicle for solving the DR log size problem,
which seems to be the main problem. If each DR is stored in a separate
WordprocessingML file having custom controls to store each field, then
members can programmatically manipulate the data in a DR in any way they
want, including interfacing with other search/retrieval systems, including
SpreadsheetML.

So, in response to your request, I propose that I add the text above to the
minutes, and assign myself an action item to report back on my
investigation.

Regards,

Rex


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jesper Lund Stocholm [mailto:jesper.stocholm at ciber.dk]
> Sent: Tuesday, September 15, 2009 3:14 AM
> To: Rex Jaeschke; SC 34 WG4
> Subject: RE: PLEASE PROOF: Day 2 Draft Minutes of the Bellevue Meeting
> 
> Hi Rex,
> 
> per Caroline's mail, shouldn't the minutes reflect the decisions you
> made on the assembla-subject?
> 
> Jesper Lund Stocholm
> ciber Danmark A/S
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Rex Jaeschke [mailto:rex at RexJaeschke.com]
> > Sent: Tuesday, September 15, 2009 4:57 AM
> > To: SC 34 WG4
> > Subject: PLEASE PROOF: Day 2 Draft Minutes of the Bellevue Meeting
> >
> > I incorporated all the edits reported to me from the Day 1 draft;
> thanks for the
> > feedback.
> >
> > Rex