PLEASE PROOF: Day 2 Draft Minutes of the Bellevue Meeting

[Jesper Lund Stocholm]

Hello, Rex,

That is fine - I was not there for the main part of your discussion, so
I was simply interested in any outcome of your talks.

:o)


Jesper Lund Stocholm
ciber Danmark A/S



> -----Original Message-----
> From: Rex Jaeschke [mailto:rex at RexJaeschke.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, September 15, 2009 4:07 PM
> To: 'SC 34 WG4'
> Subject: RE: PLEASE PROOF: Day 2 Draft Minutes of the Bellevue Meeting
> 
> Jesper, I don't recall that any decisions were made regarding this
> topic.
> You presented your document, and during the discussions that followed,
> I
> mentioned the approach that I was investigating. I'm looking at using
> 29500-related technology as the vehicle for solving the DR log size
> problem,
> which seems to be the main problem. If each DR is stored in a separate
> WordprocessingML file having custom controls to store each field, then
> members can programmatically manipulate the data in a DR in any way
> they
> want, including interfacing with other search/retrieval systems,
> including
> SpreadsheetML.
> 
> So, in response to your request, I propose that I add the text above
to
> the
> minutes, and assign myself an action item to report back on my
> investigation.
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Rex
> 
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Jesper Lund Stocholm [mailto:jesper.stocholm at ciber.dk]
> > Sent: Tuesday, September 15, 2009 3:14 AM
> > To: Rex Jaeschke; SC 34 WG4
> > Subject: RE: PLEASE PROOF: Day 2 Draft Minutes of the Bellevue
> Meeting
> >
> > Hi Rex,
> >
> > per Caroline's mail, shouldn't the minutes reflect the decisions you
> > made on the assembla-subject?
> >
> > Jesper Lund Stocholm
> > ciber Danmark A/S
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Rex Jaeschke [mailto:rex at RexJaeschke.com]
> > > Sent: Tuesday, September 15, 2009 4:57 AM
> > > To: SC 34 WG4
> > > Subject: PLEASE PROOF: Day 2 Draft Minutes of the Bellevue Meeting
> > >
> > > I incorporated all the edits reported to me from the Day 1 draft;
> > thanks for the
> > > feedback.
> > >
> > > Rex
> 
> 
>