My comments on DR 10-0001

[Jesper Lund Stocholm]

Hi Rick,


> -----Original Message-----
> From: rjelliffe at allette.com.au [mailto:rjelliffe at allette.com.au]
> Sent: 8. april 2010 05:51
> To: e-sc34-wg4 at ecma-international.org
> Subject: RE: My comments on DR 10-0001
> 
> 2) Use the XSD date but define the treatment of dates such as 2000-02-
> 31 > as a matter of error recovery. The document with this would not
be a
> conforming Strict document, and a consumer application may decide to
> fail and should report it. I probably favour this approach.

I think this would be an appropriate/reasonable approach.

> Thinking more in terms of standard error recovery strategies would a
> useful tool in our toolbelt. This is how the WhatWG are treating HTML
> for example.

It'd be interesting to hear more details on this, if you have it.

Thanks,

:-)

Jesper Lund Stocholm
ciber Danmark A/S