DR 09-0157 - WML: restriction on ordering of run properties

[Shawn Villaron]

I'd have to go back and look up the reasoning for that.  It doesn't ring a bell ... 

-----Original Message-----
From: Jirka Kosek [mailto:jirka at kosek.cz] 
Sent: Thursday, April 08, 2010 12:39 AM
To: MURATA Makoto (FAMILY Given)
Cc: e-SC34-WG4 at ecma-international.org
Subject: Re: DR 09-0157 - WML: restriction on ordering of run properties

MURATA Makoto (FAMILY Given) wrote:

> However, while reviewing the proposed changes, I have some questions.
> 
> Why is the element "rPrChange" required to follow any element in RPrBase?
> 
> Why are the elements in ParaRPrTrackChanges (namely "ins", "del", 
> "moveFrom", and "moveTo") required to precede any element in RPrBase?

I suppose that this question was targeted to our ECMA fellows.

I was trying to do minimal change to schema thus relaxing ordering only on formatting properties of run. I agree that we can further relax this and allow any ordering also for those change tracking elements. But from my point of view relaxing ordering of run formatting properties is enough.

				Jirka

--
------------------------------------------------------------------
  Jirka Kosek      e-mail: jirka at kosek.cz      http://xmlguru.cz
------------------------------------------------------------------
       Professional XML consulting and training services
  DocBook customization, custom XSLT/XSL-FO document processing
------------------------------------------------------------------
 OASIS DocBook TC member, W3C Invited Expert, ISO JTC1/SC34 member
------------------------------------------------------------------