DR 09-0157 - WML: restriction on ordering of run properties

[Jirka Kosek]

MURATA Makoto (FAMILY Given) wrote:

> However, while reviewing the proposed changes, I have some 
> questions.
> 
> Why is the element "rPrChange" required to follow any element in RPrBase?
> 
> Why are the elements in ParaRPrTrackChanges (namely "ins", "del",
> "moveFrom", and "moveTo") required to precede any element in RPrBase?

I suppose that this question was targeted to our ECMA fellows.

I was trying to do minimal change to schema thus relaxing ordering only
on formatting properties of run. I agree that we can further relax this
and allow any ordering also for those change tracking elements. But from
my point of view relaxing ordering of run formatting properties is enough.

				Jirka

-- 
------------------------------------------------------------------
  Jirka Kosek      e-mail: jirka at kosek.cz      http://xmlguru.cz
------------------------------------------------------------------
       Professional XML consulting and training services
  DocBook customization, custom XSLT/XSL-FO document processing
------------------------------------------------------------------
 OASIS DocBook TC member, W3C Invited Expert, ISO JTC1/SC34 member
------------------------------------------------------------------

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 259 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://mailman.vse.cz/pipermail/sc34wg4/attachments/20100408/a498c1fd/attachment.pgp>