RE: DR 09-0281 ? OPC: Use of the term “part”

[Chris Rae]

On this specific DR, Rex: can you add this to your list of items for a revision? Let's discuss the DR on the next call, at which point we can hopefully move it to Last Call.

Chris

-----Original Message-----
From: MURATA Makoto (FAMILY Given) [mailto:eb2m-mrt at asahi-net.or.jp] 
Sent: 30 July 2010 17:00
To: "e-SC34-WG4 at ecma-international.org <e-SC34-WG4"@ecma-international.org
Subject: Re: DR 09-0281 ? OPC: Use of the term “part”

As for this one, I think that we should accept Shawn's proposal to change the definition of "Part name" and also put this issue in our queue for part 2 revision.

Should we publish a TC for Part 2 before we revise Part 2?   That's a
separate issue and should be discussed (but not as part of this DR).

Cheers,
Makoto