DR 09-0320 ? OPC: Relationships Markup

[Chris Rae]

I was intending to refer to the general principles defined by Part 3, rather than the specific pre-processor model for processing MCE. I think we're agreed that that particular section needs some work, but it seems a shame to hold up this DR (or any other DR that refers to Part 3) until those other issues are resolved. Could we say "after the application of the principles described by ISO/IEC 29500-3" instead, and avoid the use of "process"?

Chris

-----Original Message-----
From: MURATA Makoto (FAMILY Given) [mailto:eb2m-mrt at asahi-net.or.jp] 
Sent: 14 August 2010 08:20
To: e-SC34-WG4 at ecma-international.org
Subject: Re: DR 09-0320 ? OPC: Relationships Markup

Chris wrote:

> would it
>be acceptable if we changed this wording to say "... shall be a 
>schema-valid XML document against opc-relationships.xsd after the 
>application of the processes described by ISO/IEC 29500-3"?

It would be acceptable if the process described by Part 3 was normative. 
Unfortunately, it is not.

Cheers,
Makoto