Problem with a decision made on last week's WG4 telcon

[Jirka Kosek]

Rex Jaeschke wrote:

> This fix es errors in examples, which are non-normative. As such, it do
> es NOT meet the criteria for being in an amendment. As such, I have NOT
> included this in the amendment. Inst e ad, it should be submitted as a
> DR for the next COR.

Which document will be balloted earlier -- next set of CORs or currently
processed AMDs?

This change should use faster of those two ways. We do not have criteria
for *not including into amendment*, we have only criteria for *not
including into corrigenda* which implies inclusion into amendment, but
there is no reverse implication.

					Jirka

-- 
------------------------------------------------------------------
  Jirka Kosek      e-mail: jirka at kosek.cz      http://xmlguru.cz
------------------------------------------------------------------
       Professional XML consulting and training services
  DocBook customization, custom XSLT/XSL-FO document processing
------------------------------------------------------------------
 OASIS DocBook TC member, W3C Invited Expert, ISO JTC1/SC34 member
------------------------------------------------------------------

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 259 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://mailman.vse.cz/pipermail/sc34wg4/attachments/20100127/1dff174d/attachment.pgp>