Proposed fix for DR 10-0016 ("MCE: Core Concepts")
alexb at griffinbrown.co.uk
Tue Jul 6 23:02:02 CEST 2010
> If there's general agreement that subsumption should be removed from the
> standard, I can submit a defect report through Ecma to have it removed.
If we've already arrived at a point where we're ripping out an apparently major feature of MCE (subsumption), *and* having to add a major new feature (a normative description of pre-validation processing) then I think we've gone past the point of amendment and should really be thinking about a revision. Again, I think this would also allow us to address the general poor drafting of this Part too.
I propose that we initiate a revision of Part 3 at the same time as we do it for Part 2 (in Tokyo?)
This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System.
For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email
More information about the sc34wg4