Proposed fix for DR 10-0016 ("MCE: Core Concepts")

[Chris Rae]

Hi Alex - thanks for taking a look at this. I agree with the two-step process but I have made a couple of comments in the doc and reattached it.

Chris

-----Original Message-----
From: Alex Brown [mailto:alexb at griffinbrown.co.uk] 
Sent: 21 June 2010 07:27
To: e-SC34-WG4 at ecma-international.org
Subject: Proposed fix for DR 10-0016 ("MCE: Core Concepts")

Dear all,

I think this DR can be resolved in two steps.

The first step is to introduce a definition for the term "feasibly valid" as follows:

----begin

feasibly valid

an XML document or well-balanced fragment is feasibly valid if it can be transformed into a valid document by inserting any number of attributes and elements anywhere in the tree.

----end

Section 9.2 of Part 3 can then be amended as in the attached document...

Thoughts?

- Alex.

--
Alex Brown
Convenor, ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC 34/WG 1
Editor, ISO/IEC 19757-1 (DSDL Overview)
Editor, ISO/IEC 19757-5 (Extensible Datatypes)



______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System.
For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email ______________________________________________________________________
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: DR-10-0016AB CLR.docx
Type: application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document
Size: 20818 bytes
Desc: DR-10-0016AB CLR.docx
URL: <http://mailman.vse.cz/pipermail/sc34wg4/attachments/20100621/8e02a43a/attachment-0001.bin>