Proposed fix for DR 10-0016 ("MCE: Core Concepts")

[Jesper Lund Stocholm]

Hi Chris,

As per your suggestion in the file about "removing elements" - wouldn't
it make the definition of "feasibly valid" a tautology - "fragment x is
feasibly valid to spec y if it can be transformed into a valid document
by removing or adding any number of elements and attributes" ?


Jesper Lund Stocholm
ciber Danmark A/S

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Chris Rae [mailto:Chris.Rae at microsoft.com]
> Sent: 21. juni 2010 21:53
> To: Alex Brown; e-SC34-WG4 at ecma-international.org
> Subject: RE: Proposed fix for DR 10-0016 ("MCE: Core Concepts")
> 
> Hi Alex - thanks for taking a look at this. I agree with the two-step
> process but I have made a couple of comments in the doc and reattached
> it.
> 
> Chris
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Alex Brown [mailto:alexb at griffinbrown.co.uk]
> Sent: 21 June 2010 07:27
> To: e-SC34-WG4 at ecma-international.org
> Subject: Proposed fix for DR 10-0016 ("MCE: Core Concepts")
> 
> Dear all,
> 
> I think this DR can be resolved in two steps.
> 
> The first step is to introduce a definition for the term "feasibly
> valid" as follows:
> 
> ----begin
> 
> feasibly valid
> 
> an XML document or well-balanced fragment is feasibly valid if it can
> be transformed into a valid document by inserting any number of
> attributes and elements anywhere in the tree.
> 
> ----end
> 
> Section 9.2 of Part 3 can then be amended as in the attached
> document...
> 
> Thoughts?
> 
> - Alex.
> 
> --
> Alex Brown
> Convenor, ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC 34/WG 1
> Editor, ISO/IEC 19757-1 (DSDL Overview)
> Editor, ISO/IEC 19757-5 (Extensible Datatypes)
> 
> 
> 
> ______________________________________________________________________
> This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System.
> For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email
> ______________________________________________________________________