DR 09-0305 - WML, Glossary Document: Unspecified behavior for repeated child elements

[Rex Jaeschke]

No need to make a new DR Chris. Although we agreed to close this as resolved
back in March, it has not been published, so we can simple re-open it. I
have done that. We can close it again in Beijing.

Rex


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Chris Rae [mailto:Chris.Rae at microsoft.com]
> Sent: Thursday, November 18, 2010 2:56 PM
> To: MURATA Makoto (FAMILY Given); 'SC 34 WG4'
> Subject: RE: DR 09-0305 - WML, Glossary Document: Unspecified behavior
> for repeated child elements
> 
> Fair enough. I'll suggest this as a DR to Ecma.
> 
> Chris
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: MURATA Makoto (FAMILY Given) [mailto:eb2m-mrt at asahi-net.or.jp]
> Sent: 17 November 2010 17:12
> To: 'SC 34 WG4'
> Subject: Re: DR 09-0305 - WML, Glossary Document: Unspecified behavior
> for repeated child elements
> 
> > It looks from http://www.w3schools.com/schema/el_all.asp as though it
> >does, but I'm not going to get into a schema language fight with
> >Murata-san, so I'll be happy to buckle under even the slightest of
> pressure.
> 
> Just in case.
> 
> <foo >
>   <ba1></ba1>
> </foo>
> 
> is not valid against
> 
> <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
> <xs:schema xmlns:xs="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema">
>   <xs:element name="foo">
>     <xs:complexType>
>       <xs:all minOccurs="0">
>         <xs:element name="ba1" type="xs:string"/>
>         <xs:element name="ba2" type="xs:string"/>
>       </xs:all>
>     </xs:complexType>
>   </xs:element>
> </xs:schema>
> 
> 
> Cheers,
> Makoto