DR 10-0004 Reference missing from Scope

[Rex Jaeschke]

At the Tokyo Meeting 2010-09-06/08:

There was agreement to add text along the lines of that proposed. However,
there were doubts as to whether such a thing can/should go in the Scope.
Perhaps the Foreword is a better location. Also, as each Part has its own
Scope, each Part affected by this (Parts 1, 2, and 4, apparently) should
have its own note.

Action: Rex will investigate further and draft a resolution for review by
the submitter (CH).


I have added proposed wording to the DR. See 10-0004
<http://cid-c8ba0861dc5e4adc.office.live.com/view.aspx/Public%20Documents/20
10/DR-10-0004.docx> . Let's discuss this on the next telcon, and once we
agree on the words, I will send them along to the folks in CH.

Rex



-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.vse.cz/pipermail/sc34wg4/attachments/20101013/6ed8f93c/attachment.htm>